Law. Documentation. Change.

Progress is being made

Jolanda Spiess has developed a long-term strategy from a forced confrontation: using individual cases to improve the system. The goal is not personal satisfaction but structural impact – for everyone affected by media power asymmetries.

01

Context

Jolanda Spiess

Swiss media corporations will no longer be able to avoid returning profits generated from campaigns that violate personality rights.

The ruling Jolanda Spiess secured against Ringier is not yet legally binding. However, endless tabloid smear campaigns, as experienced first-hand, are a thing of the past now that it is clear profits can be reclaimed retroactively.

How painful this decision is for the media industry, which has never distanced itself from its lucrative tabloid operations, is demonstrated by the ongoing attempts to discredit and defame Jolanda Spiess through cross-corporation measures. A journalist who conducted a "research project" on the Zug Landammann reception "on behalf of" Tamedia has since been convicted of defamation – knowingly lying and deliberately making false claims – multiple times in two instances (second instance, not final).

Proceedings against the Tamedia author and against various internet fringe figures who have united in media-fuelled hatred against Jolanda Spiess are still ongoing. Peace will likely only come once the profit disgorgement proceedings, which continue to drag on due to delaying tactics particularly by the media corporations, are concluded or a genuine settlement is reached.

Engagement, recognition, and new paths

For her commitment against hate speech and the founding of the organization #NetzCourage, Jolanda Spiess was awarded the Ida Somazzi Prize and the FemBizSwiss Award in 2021. Today she advises victims of media power abuse through Winkelried & Töchter GmbH and develops smart tools for legal documentation, research, and analysis – including for law firms. When she is not conducting proceedings, she cheers with her family for VfL Bochum – a club that never gives up.

Anyone engaged in a public and legal confrontation with the largest Swiss media houses cannot expect fair coverage of themselves or the ongoing proceedings. Those seeking an overview of the details of the individual proceedings, rulings, and documents can find them in the updated case dossiers below.

Meistgeklickt – Jolanda Spiess-Hegglin, Limmat Verlag 2024
02

Meistgeklickt

Protocol of a system failure. It began with a headline. Millions of clicks and advertising revenue for media corporations followed.

The book documents how tabloid and quality media work hand in hand and describes the legal strategy of profit disgorgement.

Get the book →
03

Cases

Systemic legal proceedings
01
Landmark Case – Profit Disgorgement
Ringier AG / Blick
Over 150 articles of a media campaign against a single person. Severe personality rights violation established by the court, Blick apology on the front page. For the first time in Switzerland, a media corporation is ordered to return profits from personality-violating reporting. Ringier's appeal pending. Campaign lawsuit for the remaining articles in preparation.
2014 – today
Won
Appeal pending
02
International – Human Rights – Intimate Privacy
ECtHR Proceedings
Cantonal Court Zug grants the request for provisional measures and confirms the publication ban. High Court overturns it. Federal Supreme Court declines to hear the appeal. Complaint to the European Court of Human Rights – Switzerland has submitted its position. At the center: May a person's intimate privacy be declared public property simply because media have disseminated it for years?
2020 – today
Ongoing
03
Defamation – Media – Personality Rights
Tamedia / Binswanger
Multiple conviction for defamation in two instances. Second conviction by penal order, then acquittal, now pending at the High Court. Ongoing civil lawsuit for nearly 200 personality-violating book passages and profit disgorgement. The complex extends across four legal levels up to the Federal Supreme Court and the ECtHR.
2020 – today
Won
Partly ongoing
04
Digital Violence – Cyberstalking – Shameleaks
Cyberstalking and media hate connections
Over a dozen proceedings against systematic cyberstalking, pornography and the illegal publication of intimate data. Coercion. House searches, arrests, contact bans, convictions.
2019 – today
Multiple wins
05
Defamation – Media
Weltwoche / Deputy Editor
Conviction in two instances for defamation. Documentation of how confidential investigation files were politically instrumentalized and published in coordination with an accused person.
2015–2017
Won
04

Timeline

2025
Profit Disgorgement Blick – Landmark Ruling
Ringier AG ordered to return profits from personality rights violations. For the first time in Swiss legal history.
2025
Tamedia Journalist – Defamation Confirmed in Two Instances
Basel-Stadt Court of Appeal confirms the defamation conviction. Case now pending at the Federal Supreme Court.
2025
SRF Documentary: Hate Online
Documentary by Eveline Falk on digital violence and the legal fight against it.
2024
Meistgeklickt – Book Publication
Protocol of a system failure. Limmat Verlag. Documentation of the mechanisms behind media personality rights violations.
2025
Shameleaks Civil Trial Won
Hinwil District Court rules in the civil trial on the illegal publication of intimate data in favor of Spiess-Hegglin.
2025
Penal Order Solothurn – Defamation
Second criminal conviction of the Tages-Anzeiger journalist for defamation in an Aktivradio interview.
2024
Cyberstalker Convictions
Pfäffikon District Court convicts both main perpetrators of pornography, defamation, and violation of court orders.
2024
Swiss Government's Observations to the ECtHR
Switzerland submits 21 pages of observations on the complaint. The Federal Council defends the Federal Supreme Court's non-entry and requests dismissal – but concedes that Art. 6 ECHR (access to court) is applicable to the proceedings.
2024
ECtHR Communicates Complaint to Switzerland
The ECtHR officially communicates the complaint to the Swiss government and submits a questionnaire: including whether access to the Federal Supreme Court was arbitrarily denied and whether the right to private life (Art. 8 ECHR) was violated.
2022
Complaint Filed with ECtHR
Complaint filed with the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg on the protection of intimate privacy – in particular, whether Switzerland arbitrarily denied access to justice.
2022
Federal Supreme Court – Non-Entry (BGE 5A_824/2021)
Federal Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal on the grounds that the appellant had «not said a word» about the irreparable harm – even though this had been addressed on six pages. A legal article by Schulthess/Aeschimann/Cottinelli (AJP 09/2022) assesses the non-entry as «overly formalistic» – the harm was «patently obvious», the adjudication of the substantive questions unjustifiably refused.
2021
High Court Zug Lifts Preliminary Injunction
High Court Zug lifts the preliminary injunction against the personality-violating publication. Appeal filed with the Federal Supreme Court.
2020
Blick Apology and High Court Ruling
High Court confirms «severe» intimate privacy violation. Ringier accepts. Blick apologizes on the front page.
2020
Cantonal Court Zug – Confirmation Decision
Zug Cantonal Court confirms the preliminary injunction in the ordinary proceedings (ES 2020 222, 3 September 2020). The publication ban protecting personality rights is maintained.
2020
Cantonal Court Zug – Preliminary Injunction
Single judge at Zug Cantonal Court grants the request for provisional measures against the personality-violating book publication and issues orders to protect personality rights (4 May 2020).
2017
Weltwoche Deputy Editor Convicted
Conviction for defamation in two instances. Instrumentalization of confidential files documented.
2016
Founding of #NetzCourage
Jolanda Spiess founds the association #NetzCourage, which supports victims of digital violence and advocates for education and prevention.
05

Reception & Factual Basis

Press Voices

A devastating analysis of Swiss tabloid media
The woman who brought tabloids to account
Who invented it?
Media-political bombshell

Factual Basis: Events of 2014

All criminal investigations against Jolanda Spiess in connection with the events of 2014 were discontinued. The then freshly elected Zug cantonal councillor could assume she was a victim of a sexual offense. Even if there is no perpetrator from a legal perspective. Spiess-Hegglin has assumed from the beginning – since her police interview at Christmas 2014 – that both parties involved were victims. More on this can be found in her book Meistgeklickt (Limmat Verlag, 2024).

06

Contact

For media inquiries, legal collaboration, or speaking engagements.

Get in touch →